The worst fears have come true. Unemployment in the country is at a four-decade-high. The figures released by the Ministry of Statistics and Program Implementation (MoSPI) on Friday pegged joblessness at 6.1 per cent. The report was released after a long delay.
 |
Releasing the data, officials said that they have used a new design methodology for the survey hence it was not comparable with previous data.
The Finance Ministry also issued a statement which said that comparing the recent jobs data with past data was faulty.
The annual report (July 2017-June 2018) of the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) pegs the all India unemployment rate at 6.1 per cent in the given year. Unemployment was higher in the urban areas as compared to the rural. For the rural areas, the unemployment rate was 5.3 per cent, while in the urban areas it was 7.8 per cent.
Among the rural men, the unemployment rate was 5.8 per cent while among the women it was 3.8 per cent. While among the urban men it was 7.8 per cent and 5.7 per cent among urban women. MoSPI officials said that the number of households surveyed was 433339 (246809 in rural areas and 46006 in urban areas).
PM Modi's acche din claims are great but what about data on jobs, farmers' suicide & crime?
The officials, however, said that this data is comparable to the previous years data.
Recognising India's evolving economy and requirements, it was decided to make a few changes with respect to availability of household data on employment-unemployment.
In the PLFS conducted from 2017-18, a decision was taken to use education levels as a criterion for stratification at the ultimate level.
The rationale for this decision was based on the act that the education levels in the economy have risen due to this various policy interventions like the Right to Education Act etc, and it would be important to assess the level of employment and unemployment using this as a stratification basis, the officials said.
But the Finance Ministry issued a statement trashing attempts to compare the 2017-18 data with previous years.
"There can be nothing farther away from the truth than saying that unemployment in India is at a 45 year low," the statement said.
It further said that past jobs data was measured using expenditure of households as a criteria, the current jobs data uses education as a criteria instead of expenditure.
In India, the labour force surveys (Employment and Unemployment Surveys or EUS) have usually been bundled along with the household Consumer Expenditure Survey, conducted typically once in five years. The employment and unemployment surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey till 2011-12 used the monthly per capita expenditure of the household in the selected villages/blocks as a basis for stratification of households.
In the PLFS conducted from 2017-18, a decision was taken to use education levels as a criterion for stratification at the ultimate level.
The change in criteria from monthly per capita expenditure to education levels for stratification of availability of household data on employment-unemployment has direct implications on the comparability of the results of PLFS with the EUS of earlier years, the finance ministry said.
In view of this, the PLFS needs to be seen as a new series for measuring employment and unemployment on an annual basis, it said.
It is important to note that with the rise in education levels in the economy and rise in household income levels, the aspiration levels of educated youth have also risen. Thus they may no longer be willing to join the labour force or work force requiring low skills and low remuneration, the minstry argued in its statement.
The Finance Ministry said that there are various facets to the employment and unemployment scenario and no single data source is complete by itself. These data sets need to be supplemented by data from other sources so as to collectively give a holistic picture of the overall employment market.
In this direction, the ministry has been bringing out a compilation of new subscribers to EPFO, ESIC and NPS to give an assessment of changes in the formal market employment.
The PLFS survey data complemented by administrative data and data from other sources need to be triangulated to get a complete picture.
ADVERTISEMENT
Reacting to the data, Congress spokesperson RPN Singh said, "We are satisfied we raised this issue during the elections but now people have made their choice, I hope the government will focus on joblessness in this tenure."
Notably, this data has been released after a long delay and controversy.
The withholding of the jobs report had made headlines in January this year when three members of the National Statistical Commission (NSC) had resigned protesting against the withholding of the NSSO’s first Annual Survey on Employment and Unemployment for 2017-18
